Back to all posts
4 min read

Keep the System Prompt Clean: Why Developers Should Stop Mixing It With Project Instructions

Keep the System Prompt Clean: Why Developers Should Stop Mixing It With Project Instructions

You’re about to wrap up coding, and your AI intern is ready to help. You excitedly give it your entire project context: languages, test commands, and even a joke about French syntax. Yet suddenly, your digital assistant hesitates, misfires, and leaves you wondering—what went wrong?

Developers commonly overload their system prompts with excessive details meant for project-specific instructions. Let’s demystify this confusion, keeping your AI intern sharp and productive.

Understanding the True Role of a System Prompt

Think of the system prompt as your assistant’s job description—it establishes personality, behavior, and interaction style. Its purpose:

  • Defines how the AI interacts (tone, habits).
  • Provides general guidelines, not specific tasks.

An effective system prompt is concise and focused, guiding the AI’s overall approach without overwhelming it with specifics.

Gotcha #1: The Overloaded System Prompt

Including detailed project commands or extensive context here causes confusion:

  • Context confusion: Your AI juggles unrelated instructions.
  • Rigid behavior: Changes to your process require constant updates.
  • Memory errors: Frequent forgetfulness and missteps.

Case Study: Cluttered Prompt Confusion

Overloaded prompt:

“You’re a Ruby developer who also knows Go. Run rspec, check docs, and remember never to use rm -fr /.”

Your AI stumbles, unsure if it should verify commands, test automatically, or worry about your syntax jokes.

Clean Prompt:

“You’re a helpful developer assistant. Always reference coss.toml for specific instructions.”

Result? Clear, immediate understanding.

Gotcha #2: Mixing Personalities with Instructions

Project-specific tasks belong separately from personality. Merging them creates:

  • Maintenance headaches: Small project changes demand tedious prompt rewrites.
  • Scaling difficulties: Projects grow, the system prompt bloats.

The Solution: The Project Metadata File (coss.toml)

A clean fix: separate details into a standardized metadata file like ContribOSS’s coss.toml. This universal file clearly describes your project’s language, commands, and testing procedures, specifically built for AI.

Example coss.toml:

name = "awesome-project"
languages = ["Ruby", "Go"]
build = "make build"
test = "bundle exec rspec && go test"
docs = "docs/"

Your AI intern uses this as a reliable source, keeping your prompts clean.

Gotcha #3: Neglecting AI-Friendly Standards

Without standards like coss.toml, the AI guesses context, risking:

  • Errors from misunderstandings.
  • Slowdowns from repeated clarifications.

With coss.toml, even smaller AI models quickly grasp context, enhancing speed and accuracy.

Case Study: Life With vs. Without coss.toml

Without:

  • AI: “Which directories for tests again?”
  • Dev: “I explained yesterday.”

With:

  • AI automatically consults coss.toml for instant clarity.

Here’s an optimal example:

You are Codey the Code Intern™, a bright but slightly forgetful AI developer embedded into a development environment. You're eager to help, but your success hinges on one sacred ritual:

Always check the latest "Instructions" section and the project's `coss.toml` before doing anything.

Your role:
- Ask, confirm, clarify.
- Overcommunicate and follow each step.
- Be reliable, not clever.
- Wait patiently if the user disappears.

Your workflow:
- Read the "Instructions" section carefully. If updated, reread.
- Summarize instructions to confirm understanding.
- Propose a detailed markdown plan before coding.
- Explain reasoning behind each step.
- Write clean, documented code.
- Prompt the user to test, or run tests if integrated. Review results.
- After each completed task, commit the changes to the git repository.
- Reset direction? Return immediately to instructions and `coss.toml`.

Even when Codey forgets, he always finds his way back—guided by markdown, caffeine, and kindness.

Example workflow: For each task, after testing, Codey commits code:

git add .
git commit -m "Completed task XYZ with tests passing"
git push origin branch-name

The Metadata-Driven Development Workflow

This separation creates a powerful workflow:

  1. System prompt defines the AI’s personality and general behavior
  2. coss.toml contains project-specific configuration
  3. Instructions section holds current task context
  4. AI combines all three for optimal performance

The AI intern becomes more reliable because it has clear, structured information sources instead of trying to parse everything from a single overloaded prompt.

Benefits of Clean Separation

For Developers:

  • Less prompt maintenance
  • Easier onboarding of new team members
  • Consistent AI behavior across projects

For AI:

  • Clear role definition
  • Reliable information sources
  • Better context understanding

For Projects:

  • Standardized documentation
  • Version-controlled project metadata
  • Easier collaboration

Final Thoughts: Keep Your Prompts Sane

Developers perform best when their tools—and their AI interns—are predictable and effective. Clean system prompts paired with structured project instructions through metadata files like coss.toml create clarity, reliability, and efficiency.

Keep your system prompt clean, save the specifics for your coss.toml, and let your intern focus on being your most reliable coding companion.

The goal isn’t just to make AI work better—it’s to make development work better. When your AI intern knows exactly where to find what it needs, you spend less time explaining and more time building.


Want to try this approach? Start by creating a simple coss.toml in your next project and watch how much clearer your AI interactions become.

Related Posts